Calories Burned Calculator Pilates — Chart & Formula

A 137 lb (62 kg) person doing Pilates at moderate effort (MET 3.0) burns about 186 calories in 60 minutes. Pilates intensity can vary with class type, equipment, and cueing, from steady mat sessions to reformer workouts and faster, higher-effort blocks. This Pilates calculator estimates calorie burn from weight, duration, and intensity so you can compare mat routines, reformer classes, and more advanced sessions with realistic numbers.

Creator profile
Creator
Melisa Arsenault
Sports coach who loves helping people train smarter. This calculator makes it easy to estimate workout burn and plan sessions with clear, practical numbers.
Last updated February 3, 2026
Table of contents

Calories Burned Calculator Pilates

For Pilates, intensity depends on format, resistance, and how continuously you move. General or mat Pilates is often around 3.0 METs, reformer Pilates commonly ranges from 3.5–4.0 METs, and advanced or intense sessions can reach 4.5+ METs depending on tempo, transitions, and time under tension.

Calculator

Estimate calories burned from Pilates sessions using weight, time, and intensity.

Estimated calories burned
195.7 kcal

Calories burned chart for Pilates

This chart gives a quick estimate for moderate Pilates (MET 3.0). Use it to compare time blocks at a glance, then adjust the calculator for your exact class format, resistance level, and body weight.

Duration137 lb (62 kg)176 lb (80 kg)220 lb (100 kg)
30 minutes98 kcal126 kcal158 kcal
45 minutes146 kcal189 kcal236 kcal
60 minutes195 kcal252 kcal315 kcal

Calories burned formula

This calculator uses a MET-based shortcut to estimate Pilates calories. MET (metabolic equivalent of task) is a simple way to score effort versus resting, and it rises with faster tempo, stronger resistance, and longer sets without breaks. Multiply the MET by your body weight in kilograms, the duration in hours, and the 1.05 factor to estimate total calories burned.

Calories = MET × weight (kg) × duration (hours) × 1.05

If you are unsure which MET to use, pick 3.0 for a steady, moderate-effort session. General or mat Pilates often sits around 3.0 METs, reformer Pilates commonly ranges from 3.5–4.0 METs, and advanced or intense sessions can reach 4.5+ METs when pace and resistance stay high.

Example calculation

Example: A 137 lb (62 kg) person does 60 minutes of moderate Pilates at MET 3.0. A quick estimate is 3.0 × 62 × 1 = 186 kcal. With the 1.05 factor used in this calculator, the calculation is 3.0 × 62 × 1 × 1.05 = 195.3 kcal.

For a reformer class at MET 3.8, the estimate becomes 3.8 × 62 × 1 × 1.05 = 247.4 kcal. If your session mixes mat work with short, higher-effort bursts, use a weighted-average MET or calculate each block and add them together.

FAQ

Is Pilates calorie burn more about strength or cardio?

Pilates is mostly strength and control, so the burn comes from time under tension and continuous movement more than high heart rates. Faster transitions and shorter breaks can raise the total.

Do longer holds change calories burned?

Yes. Longer holds keep muscles working without rest, which can raise overall effort even if the pace feels slow. That is why slower classes can still add up.

How should I pick a MET if my class mixes mat and reformer?

Use a mid-range MET for the whole session or average each section. For example, you could use 3.0 for mat work and 3.8 for reformer blocks, then average by time.

Why does the calculator use a 1.05 factor?

The 1.05 factor is a small adjustment used in this calculator to keep estimates consistent with common MET-based formulas. It helps align numbers with typical real-world totals.

Resources

Use these sources to understand how Pilates sessions are tested in labs and how MET values are assigned for mat work and apparatus classes. If you use a smartwatch or heart-rate strap, compare your readings to the calculator to see how your pace, rest time, and resistance choices shift the total.

Pilates references: 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities (official site), Systematic review of Pilates metabolic intensity (Springer), Energy expenditure in mat vs. apparatus Pilates (ScienceDirect).